
Hugo
If, like me, you've made the effort to measure your dependence on US tech, you've probably realized that this dependence is very strong.
Like, really strong.
And if you haven't done it yet, now is definitely the time.
Before we begin, I should clarify that I don't usually engage in knee-jerk anti-Americanism. I grew up under American soft power, nourished by Yankee music, TV series, and movies. I listened to Nirvana and was cradled by Star Wars and Quantum Leap.
But today, for the first time in its history, the United States could well be sliding to the dark side. And our dependency, my dependency, on US tech could be a real problem.
So, I'm going to try to take inventory, measure this dependence, and see how I could reduce it.
And for that, we're going to play a game.
We're going to play a game because, I must confess, if it feels like a game, you can get me to do anything, sports, cooking, finance, anything.
A game allows me to have an objective, to break down this objective into side quests, and ultimately to motivate myself to move forward in small steps.
And to make a good game, we need a score that reflects my dependence and that I could compare with others. We could even create a leaderboard among ourselves :)
But first, what exactly is this dependence?
When I talk about dependence, if you take the exercise of listing the applications and services you use daily, chances are you use a lot of US services.
Between phones, home delivery services, ride-sharing or streaming services, it's quite illusory to aim for zero dependence.
And, as I mentioned in a previous article, it's not necessarily desirable; interdependence also has its benefits. BUT we need to find a balance point.
This balance is useful in a negotiation to say, "you can't hassle me about A, otherwise I'll take away B."
In short, we want a score that reflects this balance.
So perhaps we could first simply try to count the number of applications?
Let's test with this list:
Summing it up, we get a score of 6/12 (50% dependence).
But we immediately see that something's off. Not all these services are equal. Can we really compare Duolingo with Amazon for example, or Twitter?
We quickly get the intuition that something's missing. Naively, the balance I'm trying to achieve should serve two objectives:
It's not the number of services I use that's important, but I must take into account the economic impact, what I pay, and the impact on data protection, both mine and that of my close contacts.
To materialize these two criteria above, I'll use a scoring system.
For scores 3 and 4, I qualify the risk as high when the company collecting the data transfers it to other companies in the same group or to partners, and when data from my contacts is also involved.
The risk is more moderate if the collected data is only related to the service I use, for example my scores on Duolingo.
This is better, but again, this score has flaws. Free doesn't mean harmless. And paid doesn't mean harmful.
For example, Duolingo (e-learning) is less dangerous in terms of tech dependence than Twitter. Twitter, which can be used to manipulate elections on a large scale.
I realize there's a third objective:
Let's start over and this time, we'll introduce all these criteria.
Let's have some fun, let's create a formula to calculate our score.
Our score is composed of:
Influence is important. So, I'm going to weight upward the capacity for influence by multiplying it by 1.5, which I choose arbitrarily. I'll also add an additional factor equal to the influence score x the financial score, because if I choose to voluntarily pay for an essential and potentially harmful service, this should be reflected in my score.
Let's take a few examples:
Facebook has already been regularly involved in opinion manipulation scandals like Cambridge Analytica or Doppelganger, so that's an II score of 3.
Its score is therefore: $0 + 2 + 3 \times 1.5 = 6.5$
Its score is therefore: $1 + 1 + 1 \times 1.5 = 4.5$
Its score (if paying for a subscription) is: $2 + 2 + 3 \times 1.5 + 3 \times 2 = 14.5$
Now, this is starting to look like something. Let's see what it gives on this list of software:
To calculate our score, which we'll call TDI (Tech Dependency Index), we'll normalize it to give a score out of 100.
The dependency score becomes the sum of US dependencies in proportion to the total:
If I do this calculation seriously, I get 72% dependence based on the applications I use.
My personal balance is clearly imbalanced.
The highest scores are for Gmail (which I pay for because I have 300GB of data on Drive), and Claude.
But now, I can play.
I know where to start, which quests are worth it (scores above 4 in general) or the easy quests (few points, but little effort).
I've started migrating from Gmail to Proton Mail (which comes with Proton Drive, Photos, Pass, and Proton VPN, all products being open source), I use more local alternatives to Amazon (Backmarket, local shops) and I will now favor FreeNow over Uber. I also plan to stop using Cloudflare to replace it with Bunny.net. I'm going to motivate myself to completely abandon Facebook, which only serves me as the boomer that I am to keep in touch with other boomers.
And the TDI (Tech Dependency Index) can allow me to anticipate the impact this will have. These few modifications will allow me to drop to 55%. And above all, I'm going to continue playing.
And if I've encouraged you to play too, this game can really start to get interesting.
If you want to participate, I invite you to download the file I'm making available (on Proton Drive of course). You'll find some typical scorings for certain applications and then, it's your turn to make the next move.
So, what's your score?
PS: if anyone wants to make a static app out of this, feel free and let me know so I can update it here.
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!